The anatomy of a corporate turnaround - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
罗尔斯-罗伊斯

The anatomy of a corporate turnaround

Reviving a struggling business requires skill, luck and adaptability

Investors are cashing in on Rolls-Royce’s turnaround story. The British engine makers’ profits more than doubled last year, with Tufan Erginbilgiç taking the helm in January 2023. Dividend payments are set to resume, and its share price is up over 60 per cent this year alone. The former BP executive, who shook up the company’s top teams, reduced duplication and culled middle managers must be pleased with himself. But he also knows how fragile the gains can be. He said Rolls-Royce’s midterm targets are a “milestone, not a destination”.

Restoring the feelgood factor, for managers, staff and shareholders, plays a vital part in the revival of any struggling enterprise. Some of the best known names in business have undergone their own revamps — from Apple to Ford to Xerox. Citigroup under Jane Fraser is another example of a turnaround under way. Purging the leadership, shrinking the headcount or rolling out some new technology alone is not enough to transform a faltering company. So what should a business do?

Having a clear grip of the level of distress is essential if a leader is to understand what type of turnaround their company needs. Is it a rescue, like BP, which was on the brink of collapse after the Deepwater Horizon disaster? Or a strategic shift, as at Netflix, which moved from rental DVDs to streaming? And which underlying strengths can a leader still exploit? 

Often fresh blood is required at the top. Whether the chief executive is an insider or outsider, has a genial disposition or a blunter leadership style, they need to have a clear vision of what success looks like, an unyielding resolve to inspire a renewed sense of purpose and a determination to execute their plan. Boards have a critical role in choosing the right person to lead an organisation, but it is the CEO and executive teams that do the heavy lifting. 

When a company has lost its way because of poor debt management and bad spending decisions, financial restructuring is likely to be unavoidable. Cutting costs, finding efficiencies and boosting productivity are central to improving operations. But getting control of the balance sheet while not choking off future growth is a challenge. Business strategies may need adjusting, too. As some companies’ actions during the pandemic showed, crises require rapid adaptation and shifts in demand may force businesses to ditch once-core products or services. Delaying necessary change will only haunt the business later.

No turnaround is possible without restoring employee confidence, which is as vital as bringing investors back on side. Every level of an organisation needs to buy into a transformation. Indeed, a cultural turnaround may be just as crucial as fixing the day-to-day machinery of a business. Satya Nadella, for example, revived Microsoft by turning staff into “learn-it-alls” instead of “know-it-alls”, fostering a growth mindset across the business.

This is where a CEO’s interpersonal skills matter. Leaders who are closing divisions, firing staff and diverting resources need to communicate these tough decisions and the reasons behind them clearly and with the utmost care. 

Luck plays its part, of course. Rolls-Royce’s turnaround efforts have coincided with the revival of defence sector spending and recruitment. Data shows CEOs that have led successful transformations are not always able to replicate their wins elsewhere. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all model. Erginbilgiç’s tough approach — he called Rolls-Royce a “burning platform” soon after joining to instil urgency in his staff — may be working. But will he have to shift his leadership style for calmer times? A well-executed turnaround does not guarantee success forever. The leaders that triumph are the ones who can adapt.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普任命鲍威尔批评人士担任最高经济职务

特朗普任命经济学家斯蒂芬•米兰担任经济顾问委员会主席,并任命亿万富翁投资者斯蒂芬•费恩伯格担任国防部副部长。

会计师事务所对美国资格考核改革提出担忧

代表“四大”的机构CAQ批评称,改革美国会计师资格规则的计划可能会使公司面临歧视诉讼,并增加入行障碍。

特朗普和海湖庄园的力量

这位前房地产开发商非常了解如何将建筑和空间有效地用作宣传。

为2024年的世界感到高兴的十个理由

从巴黎圣母院的修复到《抑制热情》的大结局,这一年其实并不算太糟。

2025年德国大选:主要的竞选承诺是什么?

各大政党提出了截然不同的计划,以重振欧洲最大经济体的命运。

“市场恐慌”:巴西财政赤字导致货币跌至新低

总统在面临其第三个任期内的最大挑战。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×